Showing posts with label edition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edition. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Not a BUF latch. Error Re-Indexing

We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
Advanced Server.
Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
them.
This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execute.
We received following error caused by the re-index:
"Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
Please help me resolve these latch errors.
Thanks,
SQL Server errorlog
WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
continuing to wait.
Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0.
It not good practice to run such major maintenance operations as dropping
and recreating all indexes (I hope you use DBCC DBREINDEX btw) at the same
time as a backup. In general running the operations in parallel will not be
much quicker than running them in series (because your resources, specially
disk I/O, are limited). And if your backup finishes before the reindexing
finishes, part of your indexes will be reindexed and part not, but you don't
know exactly which.
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Joe K." <Joe K.@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AA424678-958D-478E-B6FF-574A7885455B@.microsoft.com...
> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log
> execute.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC
> 0x962263F0.
>
>
|||Hi
What does select @.@.version return for the SQL Server?
Have a look at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310834/en-us
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309093/EN-US/
Regards
Mike
"Joe K." wrote:

> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execute.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0.
>
>

Not a BUF latch. Error Re-Indexing

We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
Advanced Server.
Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
them.
This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execute.
We received following error caused by the re-index:
"Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
Please help me resolve these latch errors.
Thanks,
SQL Server errorlog
WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
continuing to wait.
Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0.It not good practice to run such major maintenance operations as dropping
and recreating all indexes (I hope you use DBCC DBREINDEX btw) at the same
time as a backup. In general running the operations in parallel will not be
much quicker than running them in series (because your resources, specially
disk I/O, are limited). And if your backup finishes before the reindexing
finishes, part of your indexes will be reindexed and part not, but you don't
know exactly which.
--
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Joe K." <Joe K.@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AA424678-958D-478E-B6FF-574A7885455B@.microsoft.com...
> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log
> execute.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC
> 0x962263F0.
>
>|||Hi
What does select @.@.version return for the SQL Server?
Have a look at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310834/en-us
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309093/EN-US/
Regards
Mike
"Joe K." wrote:
> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execute.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0.
>
>

Not a BUF latch. Error Re-Indexing

We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
Advanced Server.
Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
them.
This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execute.
We received following error caused by the re-index:
"Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
Please help me resolve these latch errors.
Thanks,
SQL Server errorlog
WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latch.
Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
continuing to wait.
Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0.It not good practice to run such major maintenance operations as dropping
and recreating all indexes (I hope you use DBCC DBREINDEX btw) at the same
time as a backup. In general running the operations in parallel will not be
much quicker than running them in series (because your resources, specially
disk I/O, are limited). And if your backup finishes before the reindexing
finishes, part of your indexes will be reindexed and part not, but you don't
know exactly which.
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Joe K." <Joe K.@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AA424678-958D-478E-B6FF-574A7885455B@.microsoft.com...
> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log
> execute.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF
> latch.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC
> 0x962263F0.
>
>|||Hi
What does select @.@.version return for the SQL Server?
Have a look at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310834/en-us
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309093/EN-US/
Regards
Mike
"Joe K." wrote:

> We have a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database on a Windows 2000
> Advanced Server.
> Weekly we have a job that drops all indexes on the database and recreates
> them.
> This job runs at the same time the daily backup and transaction log execut
e.
> We received following error caused by the re-index:
> "Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 4..."
> Please help me resolve these latch errors.
> Thanks,
>
> SQL Server errorlog
> WARNING: EC 8a0459e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 9653c3f0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5d4ad9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 45c0b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 462df9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 5a9619e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 8a05b9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cbb9e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 6a9d19e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 89cb39e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC 84cc79e0, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> WARNING: EC b7fd35c8, 0 waited 300 sec. on latch 813f42c8. Not a BUF latc
h.
> Waiting for type 0x4, current count 0xa, current owning EC 0x6A9659E0.
> Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0x3527140, page
> 1:1), stat 0xb, object ID 6:99:0, EC 0x6F6A9520 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x10002a, current owning EC 0x962263F0
.
>
>

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

None of the Management Tools Installed...

I got SQL Server 2005 CTP (developer edition) as part of Visula Studio 2005 Beta Package. I removed all previous SQL server and Visual Studio stuff including all .NET framework versions completly. Then I installed SQL Server 2005 CTP first and selected all options (including all tools). I did not see any management tools (sql management studio or any other studio). I see all these cool services SQL Server, DTS, Reporting, Analysis etc., but no IDE to interact with what I can do with those services. Then I installed Visual Studio 2005 and it failed SQL Server Express which I do not want any way because I already installed SQL Server 2005. I am able to connect to SQL Server 2005 from Visual Studio, but lack of using real management tools makes all other services useless in SQL Server 2005. I tried to select those tools from advanced installation feature of SQL Server 2005 again and again... it gives error that I have not changed any installation changes and it can not install any tools. This is a mess. Can somebody explain what's going on here please... I greatly appreciate any help to make these tools appear.

Thanks
- KiranHi,
I had the same issue. Be sure that no express components are installed on your system. then uninstall sql server and reinstall it again. afterwards you should see the management tools. if you do not you should file a bug on product feedbakcenter about it.|||Thanks Ralph. As I mentioned, before installing SQL Server 2005, I removed everything related to either SQL Express components or VS or .NET I see in Add/Remove Software. Didn't work.|||In the setup directory on the installation CD there are several .MSI files.
I run SqlRun_Tools.msi and got the Mgmnt tools +

Monday, March 12, 2012

Nonadditive Measure in Standard Edition

How do I define a measure to be nonadditive in Standard Edition? If I set the AggregateFunction property to None, I get this error when trying to deploy:

Aggregate function None is not allowed in Standard server edition.

This is for a percentage measure based on a named calculation in my data source view. It obviously cannot be aggregated.

Any workaround for this?

-Larry


Actually, percentage calculations are perfomrmed best by cube calculated members - which are always non-aggregatable. If you compute percentage in DSV - then it will only be available at the leaves level if you were to use None aggregation function. With calculated member Ratio=Sales/Cost - you will get it computed correctly at every level in the cube.

HTH,

Mosha (http://www.mosha.com/msolap)

|||

Thanks, that worked great. I actually had a calculated measure defined for this but I called it Average % and didn't put 2 and 2 together that it gave me everything I needed!

So on the flip side, I have another calculated measure that is an Average # of Days, and I don't want this to show up at the leaf level because it's just the same as the # of Days measure. Is there any way to suppress the value at the leaf level but have it at the aggregation level?

|||

Yes - this is easy. You can define it like following:

CREATE [Average Number Of Days] = <your expression>;

(Date.Date.Days.MEMBERS, [Average Number Of Days]) = NULL; // This will supress it at the Days level.

HTH,

Mosha (http://www.mosha.com/msolap)

|||

You're right, that was easy -- but only after I fully understood what it was doing. MDX is taking me a little while to get, but it's starting to sink in.

Thanks again for your help!

-Larry

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Noise word blues

Hi,
I'm having a noise word problem that I don't seem to see in any of the other
postings.
Here is the setup:
SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3 running on Win 2003 Server.
In order to avoid the normal noise word problems we edited the noise word
file for english by just putting a space in it and saving the file and
restarting SQL Server and the search service (reboot of machine actually).
However there are still some characters that when used with a CONTAINS still
give back the noise word error. The ones we found tend to be special single
characters such as "?" or "_".
An example would be: WHERE CONTAINS(*, '"Pick" AND "?" AND "List"')
Is there any way to get these to be ignored as well or is there a
comprehensive list of these characters so we could parse them out on in the
application code? We've tried neutral word breaking and using FREETEXT and
that didn't work either.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Wayne Antinore
Unfortunately what you have to do is parse your content and replace these
characters with a token, i.e. replace "?" with " QuestionMark " and then in
your queries when someone is querying on a ? expand this to a query on
QuestionMark.
You will need to replace the ? mark with a token which will not be searched
on and you will need to surround this token with white space for it to work
correctly.
When you return the data to the client make sure you replace the token back
with ?, or have non marked up content somewhere and return this content
instead.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Wayne Antinore" <wantinore@.veramark.com> wrote in message
news:uZNyLtirFHA.2212@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I'm having a noise word problem that I don't seem to see in any of the
other
> postings.
> Here is the setup:
> SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition SP3 running on Win 2003 Server.
> In order to avoid the normal noise word problems we edited the noise word
> file for english by just putting a space in it and saving the file and
> restarting SQL Server and the search service (reboot of machine actually).
> However there are still some characters that when used with a CONTAINS
still
> give back the noise word error. The ones we found tend to be special
single
> characters such as "?" or "_".
> An example would be: WHERE CONTAINS(*, '"Pick" AND "?" AND "List"')
> Is there any way to get these to be ignored as well or is there a
> comprehensive list of these characters so we could parse them out on in
the
> application code? We've tried neutral word breaking and using FREETEXT
and
> that didn't work either.
> Thanks in advance for any help,
> Wayne Antinore
>
|||Thanks Hilary,
Yuck!, but thanks anyway at least now I know there isn't a quick fix that
I'm missing
Wayne
"Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OJv7yJjrFHA.2272@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Unfortunately what you have to do is parse your content and replace these
> characters with a token, i.e. replace "?" with " QuestionMark " and then
> in
> your queries when someone is querying on a ? expand this to a query on
> QuestionMark.
> You will need to replace the ? mark with a token which will not be
> searched
> on and you will need to surround this token with white space for it to
> work
> correctly.
> When you return the data to the client make sure you replace the token
> back
> with ?, or have non marked up content somewhere and return this content
> instead.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> "Wayne Antinore" <wantinore@.veramark.com> wrote in message
> news:uZNyLtirFHA.2212@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> other
> still
> single
> the
> and
>

Monday, February 20, 2012

No support for SQL Express or SQL Developer edition running on Virtual PC?

Am I miss-reading something? After spending hours upon hours trying to install VS2005 Beta 2 June CTP edition, I stumbled across some documentation that basically says that SQL Express is *not* supported running on a Virtual PC.

Has anyone else run into this problem?

This is the documentation that I found:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/9/5/99599cc4-93ee-4252-85dd-23abff8631b0/RequirementsSQLEXP2005.htm
SQL Express will work fine on Virtual PC.